Home     All Posts     RSS XML     Search     Contact

Marketplace

Casino Royale

Casino RoyaleCasino Royale Review - bonds likely

The new James Bond, Casino Royale, Daniel Craig's eyes, is by far the best Bond film ever made. The best?

Not necessarily in terms of special effects, spectacular scenes peak at the end of the film, or even the action sequences. It is the best because it is more credible, both in terms of character itself, and history.

Casino Royale is an action movie, of course, but with some surprises near the reality you suggest it could have actually happened.

The previous Bond films have been somewhat too Hollywood, too fixed for practical solutions, and left the viewer without needing to think.

There is no lack of real action, and the fight scenes instead of being just a dance, are planed on realism.

Daniel Craig is not Sean Connery, but nevertheless, you experience the events that formed by James Bond in what has become and in this film, you might think.

The plot in which Bond is assigned to play Texas Hold'em (a new form of poker high risk) is also very credible.

Bond errors in his technique, and loses a lot of money for the villain of the piece. But back to play the game the best way, and in a very realistic scene, he holds the cards to make a tie against the wicked Full House.

Like all the other scenes, the development and history, its very credibility.

Gadgets are underestimated, and all Sony-based (Sony Columbia Pictures has), but not as blatant product placement "as it could have been.

The director and writers have a mission here to do good things natural and believable, and they succeeded for the most part.

The development as a lady killer as Bond is well thought out and, with a British Treasury official, a naturally beautiful girl, started to take care of game play James Bond.

She is played by Eva Green, Vesper Lynd, and is a typical Bond girl.

She is certainly intelligent, witty, voluntary and not immediately join Bond in bed. His role is as credible (although her death is not), but it becomes necessary so you can see the development of single-bond character.

Search Daniel Craig is exactly what the role of Bond is a spy, assassin, patriot, and professional in his work.

Other bonds were famous actors played their roles well, but never quite credible. We believe they have reached a high degree of realism with Craig.

The villains are believable as calm, as their wickedness.

Sponsors of Terrorism, as a theme is quite topical and actors selected to give you any doubt that they can be capable of the task. It's money on BIG and villainy, and there is enough evidence of it in this film as well.

The film runs 144 minutes, and although it is not packed as were the other Bond films with explosions, action and fighting, there was not a dull moment.

Craig and the actors are excellent, the director and writers are to be congratulated. The film is a must, and will undoubtedly field for all the Bonds during the 21 century.



Posted on July 11, 2010.
Share |

Comments

There are no comments.

Leave a Comment

Your Name
Your Email
Comments
Human Check. Type 2960.

Newest Posts
The Man With The Golden Arm
Man Who Fell To Earth
Versus
Slacker
No Holds Barred
Spawn Of The Slithis
Great Escape, The
I'm All Right Jack

My Friends
Marc Jacobs Shopping
HTC Touch Zone
Celebrity Resource
Car Zing
Vespa Store
Skechers Superstore
Anne Geddes Store
Fred Perry Shopping
Muscle Carts
Welterweight Online